The Great HR Leadership Migration: Where Top Talent is Moving in 2025

A comprehensive analysis of 200 companies reveals surprising patterns in senior HR talent movement across industries

The human resources leadership landscape is undergoing a dramatic transformation. Our analysis of 200 U.S. companies reveals clear winners and losers in the battle for senior HR talent—with some industries doubling their leadership teams while others shed experienced professionals at alarming rates.

The Data Story

Using GrauntX talent analytics, we tracked director-level and above HR professionals across 200 companies from October 2024 to September 2025. The results reveal a stark divide: while some industries are desperately competing for HR leadership talent, others are systematically reducing their senior HR capabilities.

The methodology: We analyzed the top 100 companies with the highest HR leadership growth rates alongside the 100 companies with the steepest declines, focusing exclusively on senior roles (directors, VPs, CHROs) at companies with 50+ employees.

The Winners: Industries Doubling Down on HR Leadership

Healthcare: Leading Broad-Based Expansion

Healthcare emerges as the clear winner, with nearly 8 out of 10 organizations expanding HR leadership. Companies like Labcorp (+26.7%), Quest Diagnostics (+17.4%), and CHRISTUS Health (+100%) represent a sector-wide response to workforce crisis.

Why it's happening: The pandemic created an existential workforce crisis requiring sophisticated HR leadership across the entire industry, not just a few companies. This isn't about efficiency or transformation—it's about organizational survival.

Professional Services: Consistent Strategic Investment

With 75% of firms growing HR teams, professional services shows the most consistent expansion pattern. CBIZ (+19.5%) and KPMG US (+6.9%) exemplify an industry where talent strategy directly drives business success.

The driver: In knowledge-based businesses, HR leadership isn't overhead—it's core business capability. The high consistency rate shows this is strategic investment across the sector.

Financial Services: More Mixed Than Expected

Only 60% of financial institutions are growing HR leadership, revealing a more nuanced picture than our initial analysis suggested. While M&T Bank's 100% growth grabbed attention, many banks are actually contracting.

Reality check: Digital transformation in banking is driving selective rather than universal HR investment. Success stories like M&T Bank (acquisition-driven) mask broader sector consolidation.

The Losers: Where HR Leadership is Shrinking

Technology: Systematic Industry-Wide Contraction

With only 27% of tech companies growing HR leadership, this represents one of the most dramatic sector-wide reductions. Meta (-16.7%), LinkedIn (-14%), and Intel (-12.8%) exemplify an industry-wide recalibration.

The reality: This isn't just post-pandemic efficiency—it's systematic reduction across the sector. Tech companies are using their own automation tools to reduce traditional HR leadership while potentially maintaining capabilities through embedded business partners and advanced analytics.

Entertainment: Existential Business Model Crisis

Only 1 in 5 entertainment companies are growing HR teams, with Paramount (-23.1%) leading steep declines. This reflects fundamental industry restructuring rather than efficiency drives.

Government: Centralization and Budget Constraints

Two-thirds of government entities are reducing HR leadership, reflecting public sector trends toward administrative consolidation and budget-driven efficiency measures.

What the Numbers Really Mean

When interpreting these migration patterns, context matters enormously. A 100% increase at an established company like M&T Bank represents a strategic doubling of existing capabilities, while the same percentage at a smaller organization might represent adding just one or two senior roles.

Both scenarios signal important strategic shifts, but they reflect different organizational positions: expansion of mature HR functions versus establishment of new HR leadership capabilities.

The Strategic Pattern: Transformation vs. Efficiency

The data reveals a clear strategic divide:

• Transformation Industries (healthcare, banking, manufacturing) are expanding HR leadership because they're navigating complex business model changes that require sophisticated people strategies.

• Efficiency Industries (technology, consumer goods) are reducing HR leadership through automation, consolidation, or business model simplification.

Company Size Matters

Key Insight: The data reveals a dramatic inverse relationship—85% of small companies successfully grow HR leadership while only 25% of extra-large organizations do. This suggests agility and resource allocation flexibility significantly impact HR talent attraction capabilities.

Note: Using median growth rates provides more stable measurements, less affected by extreme outliers than averages.

What This Means for HR Leaders

If you're in a growth industry:

• Align expanded HR capabilities with specific strategic objectives

• Develop specialized expertise for your industry's unique challenges

• Create governance structures to coordinate expanded HR leadership

If you're in a contraction industry:

• Preserve critical strategic capabilities despite overall reductions

• Ensure technology investments enhance rather than replace strategic thinking

• Maintain focus on employee experience with leaner teams

The Future of HR Leadership

Three trends are emerging from our data:

1. Specialized Expertise Over Generalist Roles: Growth is concentrated in sectors facing complex challenges, suggesting demand for specialized HR capabilities.

2. Business Integration Over Administrative Function: The most successful HR expansions occur where HR leadership is deeply integrated with business strategy.

3. Technology as Enabler, Not Replacement: While technology reduces needs for operational HR roles, it increases demand for strategic HR leadership in complex environments.

The Bottom Line

The migration patterns of senior HR talent reveal fundamental strategic positioning rather than simple headcount management. Organizations expanding HR leadership view talent as a competitive differentiator and transformation enabler. Those reducing HR leadership often prioritize operational efficiency or leverage technology to automate traditional functions.

For HR professionals, these patterns signal clear opportunities: expertise in transformation, change management, and strategic workforce planning is increasingly valuable, while traditional administrative HR leadership faces pressure from automation and consolidation.

The question for every organization: Are you investing in HR leadership as a strategic capability, or managing it as an administrative cost center? The data suggests this distinction increasingly determines who wins the talent war.

---

This analysis is based on GrauntX talent analytics data tracking 200 U.S. companies from October 2024 to September 2025. For detailed methodology and complete dataset, contact our research team.

Jonathan H. Westover, PhD is Chief Academic & Learning Officer (HCI Academy); Associate Dean and Director of HR Programs (WGU); Professor, Organizational Leadership (UVU); OD/HR/Leadership Consultant (Human Capital Innovations). Read Jonathan Westover's executive profile here.

Fei Tang is the Co-founder of GrauntX.ai and a serial entrepreneur with extensive experience in talent analytics, HR technology, and AI innovation. She has led data and people strategy initiatives across global organizations, focusing on bridging labor market research with practical business applications. Fei is passionate about uncovering early signals of organizational and talent shifts to help leaders make smarter decisions. She can be reached at feitang@grauntx.ai.