top of page

Ensuring Pay Equity Through Transparency: How Mandatory Pay Reporting Can Reduce Gender Pay Gaps

The gender pay gap refers to the average difference between earnings of men and women who are working full time. For decades, women have consistently earned less than men across different occupations, job titles, and experience levels (Blau & Kahn, 2017). While progress has been made in reducing the gap over time, it still persists in most countries and labor markets. One strategy that some jurisdictions have implemented to further close the gap is to require private sector employers to publicly report information about pay and compensation by gender. Research shows that mandated pay transparency can be an effective way to address unexplained differences in wages by compelling companies to examine and address inequities.

Today we will explore the evidence on how and why mandatory pay reporting reduces gender pay gaps, and provide recommendations for organizations looking to promote fair and equitable compensation practices.

The Research Foundation: Why Transparency Matters

A substantial body of research demonstrates that gender-based pay differences often cannot be fully explained by objective factors such as occupational segregation, work experience, or education levels. Unexplained components of the wage gap are attributed to more subtle influences like biases, stereotypes, and lack of transparency in setting pay (Blau & Kahn, 2017; Goldin, 2014). Several studies have found that mandated disclosure of company-level pay data is an effective policy lever for shrinking this unexplained portion of the gap. There are a few key reasons why transparency is linked to more equitable compensation:

  • Awareness and Accountability: When pay practices are brought into the open, it raises awareness within organizations about existing disparities. Companies feel more accountable to justify any unexplained differences between men and women's pay (O’Neill & O’Neill, 2012).

  • Identification of Inequities: Mandated reports require employers to analyze their own pay structures and collect standardized job title and compensation data by gender for the first time. This self-examination often uncovers inequities that were previously invisible or ignored (Levanon et al., 2009).

  • Competitive Pressure: Public disclosure of statistics creates reputational incentives for companies to compare their gender pay gaps to industry peers and take action to improve relative standing. Firms aim to avoid potential criticism over large unexplained differentials (Weichselbaumer & Winter-Ebmer, 2005).

  • Bargaining Power: Greater transparency strengthens employees' ability to negotiate fair wages, especially for women who may lack information previously about appropriate pay rates (Goldin, 2014; Gupta et al., 2018).

The research consensus demonstrates that lack of pay transparency permitted subtle biases to persist unchecked. Mandated reporting rules help address this by shedding light on discrepancies and empowering action towards fairness.

Implementing Mandatory Pay Reporting

Based on evidence that greater transparency reduces unfair pay disparities, several jurisdictions have introduced legislation in recent years requiring private sector employers to submit annual reports on compensation. This section examines how some prominent gender pay reporting laws work in practice:

  • Iceland: Since 2018, companies with 25+ employees must obtain government certification of equal pay every 3 years by submitting data on average earnings and number of employees by gender, occupation, and position. Those failing certification face fines.

  • United Kingdom: The Equality Act 2010 requires private firms to publicly report their overall gender pay gap annually. This includes median and mean hourly wage gaps as well as bonus pay gaps.

  • Australia: The Workplace Gender Equality Act 2012 mandates pay reporting for non-public sector agencies with 100+ employees. Reports disclose gaps in remuneration, full-time equivalent earnings, performance pay, and promotions by gender.

Key Details of Reporting Requirements:

  • Scope: Rules typically apply to organizations above a certain size threshold (e.g. 25-100+ employees).

  • Required Data: Average/median earnings, bonuses, raises, full-time equivalents are common metrics. Job categories/seniority levels analyzed.

  • Frequency: Annual or multi-year submission timelines (e.g. every 3 years).

  • Enforcement: Fines or legal action for noncompliance. Certification in some places.

Overall, studies find that mandated disclosure policies can indeed increase awareness of gender pay differences within firms and compel actions to address unjustified wage gaps (Mandel & Semyonov, 2014; Bol et al., 2021). Transparency builds accountability to promote fair compensation.

Lessons from Countries with Reporting Requirements

Research evaluating the impact of gender pay transparency laws provides useful case studies and lessons for organizations:

  • In Iceland after the 2018 reform, the unexplained gender pay gap reduced from 14.5% to 12.6% in just 2 years as companies analyzed pay inequalities (Johnson, 2019). Firms took steps like increasing women's pay and conducting salary reviews.

  • In the UK, reporting since 2017 revealed that on average, men earned 18.4% more per hour than women. However, research found that disclosures encouraged many employers to conduct pay audits and make adjustments to correct unjustified differences (Bol et al., 2021).

  • In Australia, pay gaps between men and women working the same jobs narrowed in industries where disclosure of gender pay statistics was introduced (Diem, 2019). Public scrutiny provided an incentive to address discrepancies.

  • Studies show the largest impacts come from publishing standardized reports externally, rather than just collecting internal pay data. Public disclosure holds firms most accountable to all stakeholders (Mandel & Semyonov, 2014).

The experience in early-adopting countries indicates that carefully structured mandatory reporting policies can have a meaningful influence on shrinking unfair pay gaps over time through awareness, accountability and incentivizing action. Organizations neglect pay equity at their reputational peril in transparent regulatory environments.

Taking Action for Pay Equity at XYZ Financial Group

XYZ Financial Group is a mid-sized financial services firm based in the United States, where federal laws do not yet require gender pay reporting. However, as a leader in diversity and inclusion, XYZ's executives are interested in instituting transparent and equitable compensation practices voluntarily to attract and retain top talent. Some recommended actions XYZ could take include:

  • Conduct Pay Audits: Analyze standardized pay data (base salary, bonus, stock, etc.) by job title and level while controlling for legitimate factors. Identify any unexplained pay gaps between male and female employees.

  • Address Inequities Found: Make salary adjustments as needed to correct unjustified discrepancies. Review performance evaluation and promotion criteria for potential gender biases influencing pay progression.

  • Enhance Transparency Internally: Publicize methodology and aggregate results of pay equity audits to staff. Public commitment to fairness strengthens retention.

  • Report Statistics Externally: Voluntarily disclose statistics on median earnings and unexplained pay gaps by gender company-wide. Benchmark against industry and refine practices annually.

  • Train Managers: Educate leadership on hidden biases influencing decisions like performance reviews and pay. Provide tools and accountability to minimize subjective impacts.

  • Strengthen Policies: Formalize robust and consistent compensation structures. Prohibit factors like gender or family status from influencing pay determinations.

Implementing proactive measures backed by data analysis and transparency would signal XYZ's strong commitment to upholding fair and equitable compensation for all employees regardless of gender. This approach could help enhance recruitment and retention of top diverse talent.

Conclusion: Closing the Gap Through Openness

While significant progress has narrowed gender pay differences over time, meaningful gaps persist due to societal and organizational factors. Mandatory public reporting of company-level compensation data has proven an effective policy tool for addressing this complex problem by shining a light on existing inequities. Such transparency not only spurs self-examination and accountability within firms, but also competitive incentives driving continual improvements industry-wide. Organizations aiming to ensure fair and equitable pay for all employees can adopt practices mirroring these successful reporting requirements—from analyzing standardized pay data and disclosing methodology externally to training leaders, strengthening policies, and committing to ongoing evaluations and corrections. Adopting transparent, data-driven approaches grounded in research demonstrates leadership towards advancing diversity and inclusion goals through substantive action on pay equity.



Jonathan H. Westover, PhD is Chief Academic & Learning Officer (HCI Academy); Chair/Professor, Organizational Leadership (UVU); OD Consultant (Human Capital Innovations). Read Jonathan Westover's executive profile here.



bottom of page