The Hidden Cost of Poor Job Quality: Why Workers Are Struggling and What Organizations Can Do About It

Listen to this article:

Abstract: The American Job Quality Study reveals a critical workforce gap: 60% of U.S. workers lack quality jobs across five dimensions—financial well-being, workplace safety and respect, growth opportunities, voice in decisions, and schedule control. This nationally representative survey of over 18,000 workers demonstrates that poor job quality correlates with diminished employee satisfaction, reduced retention, and weaker business performance. Organizations face mounting pressure to address systemic deficits in worker agency, with 62% lacking schedule control and 55% reporting limited input on decisions affecting them. This article presents evidence-based interventions spanning transparent communication, procedural justice, capability development, operating model redesign, and comprehensive benefits. Building long-term workforce resilience requires organizations to recalibrate psychological contracts, distribute leadership authority, and embed continuous learning systems that elevate job quality from compliance checkbox to strategic advantage.

The metrics we've traditionally used to gauge labor market health—unemployment rates, wage growth, job creation—tell an incomplete story. A worker can be employed, earning above minimum wage, yet experience chronic stress from unpredictable scheduling, lack meaningful advancement pathways, and have no voice in decisions shaping daily work life. The 2025 American Job Quality Study confirms what front-line workers have long known: having a job and having a quality job are fundamentally different experiences with profoundly different consequences (Jobs for the Future, 2025).

The study's central finding—that 60% of U.S. workers lack quality jobs—represents both a workforce crisis and an untapped strategic opportunity. Organizations that systematically improve job quality don't just fulfill social responsibility; they unlock measurable improvements in retention, productivity, innovation, and customer outcomes. This article examines the practical stakes of job quality, explores organizational and individual consequences, and presents evidence-based responses that translate insights into operational reality.

The Job Quality Landscape

Defining Job Quality in the Contemporary Workforce

The American Job Quality Study establishes a multidimensional framework grounded in what workers and businesses both identify as critical to sustainable employment. Unlike wage-focused measures, this framework recognizes that job quality emerges from five core dimensions (Jobs for the Future, 2025):

• Financial well-being encompasses fair compensation, employment stability, and benefits reducing financial stress

• Workplace culture and safety captures physically and psychologically safe environments free from discrimination and preventable hazards

• Growth and development opportunities address whether jobs provide pathways to build skills and advance careers

• Agency and voice measure workers' influence over decisions affecting their jobs—pay, conditions, technology, work processes

• Work structure and autonomy evaluate schedule predictability, workload manageability, and meaningful control over when and how work gets accomplished

Psychological safety—the ability to speak up without fear of retaliation—has emerged as a significant predictor of team performance and innovation (Edmondson, 2019). Each dimension connects to outcomes organizations care about: retention, productivity, quality, safety incidents, and innovation capacity.

Prevalence and Distribution

The finding that only 40% of workers hold quality jobs masks significant variation across industries and occupations. More than half (62%) lack schedule control—a proportion rising sharply in hourly service roles and warehouse operations where algorithmic management determines shifts (Jobs for the Future, 2025). Similarly, 55% report limited input on workplace decisions affecting them.

Several structural drivers explain these patterns. The erosion of worker bargaining power has shifted employment relationships toward employer unilateral control. Technological systems designed to optimize efficiency often reduce worker discretion. Cost-minimization strategies in competitive industries drive just-in-time scheduling, benefit restrictions, and minimal training investment.

Professional roles with credential requirements tend to offer greater autonomy and development resources. Conversely, roles with high turnover and low entry barriers—retail, food service, warehousing, personal care—systematically underperform on job quality dimensions, with important equity implications for workers of color, women, and those without four-year degrees.

Organizational and Individual Consequences

Organizational Performance Impacts

The business case for job quality rests on quantifiable outcomes. Organizations with higher job quality demonstrate measurably better retention, productivity, customer satisfaction, and profitability.

Turnover and retention. High turnover imposes direct costs (recruiting, onboarding, training) and indirect costs (lost productivity, institutional knowledge, customer relationship disruption). Organizations improving schedule predictability and worker development see meaningful turnover reductions (Ton, 2014).

Productivity and efficiency. Research on retail operations demonstrates that investing in adequate staffing, training, and employee empowerment generates productivity gains exceeding labor cost increases (Ton, 2014). Stores with better-trained, stable workforces process inventory faster, reduce stockouts, and achieve higher sales per labor hour.

Innovation and adaptation. Organizations granting workers meaningful voice access distributed intelligence. Front-line employees identify process improvements and customer insights that would never reach leadership through hierarchical reporting. Suppressing this voice forfeits competitive advantage.

Individual Wellbeing Impacts

Poor job quality extracts measurable tolls on worker health and family stability—consequences feeding back into organizational performance through presenteeism and healthcare costs.

Unpredictable scheduling disrupts sleep, complicates childcare, and prevents workers from maintaining second jobs or educational pursuits. Research demonstrates that children in families with unstable work schedules show higher behavioral problems and poorer academic outcomes (Schneider & Harknett, 2019). Jobs lacking growth opportunities trap workers in low-wage occupations with limited skill development, creating mobility ceilings that contribute to wage stagnation.

Evidence-Based Organizational Responses

Transparent Communication and Expectation-Setting

Clear, honest communication about work expectations, scheduling, compensation, and decision-making reduces information asymmetry and builds trust. Evidence suggests that advance schedule notice, transparent advancement criteria, and open explanation of operational decisions improve worker wellbeing without necessarily requiring major operational overhauls.

Effective approaches include:

• Schedule visibility: Posting schedules two weeks ahead; minimizing on-call shifts; compensating workers for cancelled shifts

• Clear advancement pathways: Publishing promotion criteria; identifying required competencies; making internal postings visible

• Pay transparency: Explaining wage determination; sharing pay ranges; addressing equity gaps proactively

• Technology communication: Involving workers when introducing new systems; explaining rationale; soliciting input

Gap Inc. implemented workforce scheduling allowing workers to set availability preferences and offered stability incentives. Workers opting into stable schedules reported improved wellbeing, and the company experienced productivity gains from reduced absenteeism—demonstrating that transparency and choice deliver mutual gains.

Procedural Justice and Voice Mechanisms

Procedural justice—perceived fairness of decision-making processes—significantly affects employee reactions. Workers with input into decisions affecting their work often accept even unfavorable outcomes better than those excluded. Voice mechanisms range from informal consultation to formal shared governance.

Research on participatory management consistently shows benefits: higher satisfaction, stronger commitment, reduced turnover, improved problem-solving (Edmondson, 2019). The challenge lies in authentic implementation—token consultation breeds cynicism.

Effective approaches include:

• Regular input sessions: Team meetings for operational improvements; safety huddles identifying hazards

• Worker committees: Scheduling committees developing coverage solutions; safety committees with investigation authority

• Suggestion systems: Mechanisms for submitting ideas with visible tracking and recognition

• Formal representation: Works councils; union partnerships enabling collaborative problem-solving

Kaiser Permanente established labor-management partnerships giving unions and workers formal voice in operational decisions, technology implementation, and quality improvement. These partnerships have been associated with improvements in patient outcomes, workplace safety, and worker satisfaction while maintaining organizational performance.

Capability Building and Development Infrastructure

Investments in worker development address multiple job quality dimensions simultaneously: growth opportunities, organizational commitment signaling, enhanced productivity, and retention. Yet many employers underinvest in training, fearing workers will leave—a collectively self-defeating calculation.

Effective approaches include:

• Structured on-the-job training: Formal mentorship; skill checklists with competency validation; cross-training

• Tuition assistance: Subsidizing relevant coursework; partnering with community colleges; stackable credential pathways

• Career lattices: Mapping lateral and vertical movement; posting internal opportunities before external recruitment

• Skill recognition: Credentialing skills from prior experience; providing digital badges for demonstrated competencies

CVS Health developed pharmacy technician career pathways with clear competency requirements, paid training, and advancement milestones. Workers entering as cashiers could progress through pharmacy assistant, certified technician, and specialized roles with increasing responsibility and pay. The pathway reduced pharmacy turnover and improved customer service quality.

Operating Model and Work Design Reforms

Fundamental redesign of how work gets organized often proves necessary for sustainable job quality improvement. This includes examining staffing models, task allocation, scheduling systems, and performance measurement. Research on "good jobs strategy" demonstrates that investing in adequate staffing, cross-training, and empowerment creates virtuous cycles where better service drives growth funding higher labor investment (Ton, 2014).

Effective approaches include:

• Adequate staffing: Moving from minimum toward optimal staffing; building capacity buffers

• Cross-training: Developing workers who perform multiple functions; reducing boredom; building resilience

• Scheduling redesign: Replacing algorithmic just-in-time scheduling with worker-friendly approaches

• Performance rebalancing: Incorporating job quality indicators; evaluating managers on development and retention

Costco's operating model—above-market wages, comprehensive benefits, manageable workloads, promotion-from-within culture—generates higher labor costs than competitors but achieves superior productivity, lower turnover, and stronger sales per employee (Ton, 2014). The company's deliberate job quality investment supports differentiated retail strategy emphasizing service and member loyalty.

Comprehensive Benefits and Financial Security

Financial wellbeing extends beyond wages to benefits reducing economic stress: health insurance, retirement savings, paid leave, predictable income. Organizations extending benefits to previously excluded workers or enhancing generosity address core job quality deficits and improve retention.

Effective approaches include:

• Universal benefits access: Extending health insurance and retirement to part-time workers; prorating by hours worked

• Emergency assistance: Grants or low-interest loans for unexpected expenses

• Predictable income supports: Advance access to earned wages; predictable scheduling

• Enhanced leave policies: Paid sick leave covering family care; parental leave; sabbatical options

Patagonia offers comprehensive benefits including on-site childcare, generous parental leave, flexible scheduling, and paid time for environmental activism. The benefits package contributes to remarkably low turnover and strong cultural alignment enhancing brand authenticity and innovation capacity.

Building Long-Term Workforce Capability

Psychological Contract Recalibration

The psychological contract—implicit mutual expectations between workers and employers—requires explicit recalibration. Organizations that articulate clear value propositions—"here's what we commit to providing; here's what we expect"—create foundations for trust. This might involve explicit promises around schedule stability in exchange for peak-period flexibility, or investment in portable skill development in exchange for knowledge sharing during tenure.

Distributed Leadership and Empowerment

Hierarchical command-and-control structures concentrate decision authority away from front-line workers who often possess best information about operational realities and improvement opportunities. Distributed leadership models push decision authority downward, develop capabilities throughout the organization, and create accountability for outcomes rather than rigid process compliance (Edmondson, 2019).

Practical steps include developing team-level decision authority over work processes, training workers in problem-solving, establishing clear boundaries for autonomous decision-making, and creating feedback loops capturing learning.

Continuous Learning and Adaptive Capability

The pace of change demands workforces capable of continuous learning. Organizations embedding learning into normal work—rather than separate training events—build adaptive capacity serving both agility and development. This involves creating cultures where asking questions is valued, establishing rapid experimentation cycles, and building digital infrastructure making knowledge accessible (Edmondson, 2019).

Conclusion

The American Job Quality Study's finding that 60% of U.S. workers lack quality jobs represents a clear call to action. Poor job quality extracts measurable costs in turnover, productivity, safety, innovation, and worker health—costs often exceeding investments required to improve conditions.

Evidence-based interventions exist across multiple domains: transparent communication, genuine voice mechanisms, systematic capability development, operating model redesign, and comprehensive benefits. Organizations from Gap Inc. to Kaiser Permanente, CVS Health to Costco and Patagonia demonstrate that job quality improvements deliver business results while enhancing worker wellbeing.

Building long-term capability requires recalibrating psychological contracts, distributing leadership authority, and embedding continuous learning. The American Job Quality Study provides a measurement framework enabling organizations to assess performance, identify priorities, and track progress. Leaders treating job quality as strategic asset—rather than cost to minimize—will build competitive advantage through superior workforce capability, customer relationships, and adaptive capacity. The question is not whether job quality matters, but whether organizations will act on what evidence clearly shows: quality jobs drive quality outcomes, for businesses and the people who power them.

References

1. Edmondson, A. C. (2019). The fearless organization: Creating psychological safety in the workplace for learning, innovation, and growth. Wiley.

2. Jobs for the Future. (2025). The American Job Quality Study: 2025 state of the U.S. labor force. Jobs for the Future.

3. Schneider, D., & Harknett, K. (2019). Consequences of routine work-schedule instability for worker health and well-being. American Sociological Review, 84(1), 82–114.

4. Ton, Z. (2014). The good jobs strategy: How the smartest companies invest in employees to lower costs and boost profits. New Harvest.

---

Jonathan H. Westover, PhD is Chief Academic & Learning Officer (HCI Academy); Associate Dean and Director of HR Programs (WGU); Professor, Organizational Leadership (UVU); OD/HR/Leadership Consultant (Human Capital Innovations). Read Jonathan Westover's executive profile here.

---

Suggested Citation: Westover, J. H. (2025). The Hidden Cost of Poor Job Quality: Why Workers Are Struggling and What Organizations Can Do About It. Human Capital Leadership Review, 27(1). doi.org/10.70175/hclreview.2020.27.1.5