Closing the Digital Skills Gap: Building Organizational Capability for the AI Era

Jonathan H. Westover, PhD
3 hours ago
17 min read

Listen to this article:

Abstract: Organizations face mounting pressure to develop digital fluency across their entire workforce, not merely within technical departments. Research indicates companies with advanced digital and AI capabilities outperform competitors by two to six times in total shareholder returns, yet only 28 percent plan significant upskilling investments despite 80 percent acknowledging it as the most effective gap-closing strategy. This analysis examines the strategic imperative for comprehensive digital skill development, exploring organizational performance impacts, individual wellbeing consequences, and evidence-based interventions. Drawing on recent practitioner insights and academic research, the article synthesizes effective approaches including targeted skill-building programs, learner-centered design, technology-embedded learning, and manager-as-teacher models. Case examples from consumer goods, professional services, and retail sectors illustrate successful implementation strategies. The article concludes by proposing forward-looking capabilities in learning integration, AI-powered instruction, and knowledge democratization to build sustainable competitive advantage in an accelerating technological landscape.

The digital transformation imperative has evolved from a technical department concern into an enterprise-wide strategic priority. As artificial intelligence capabilities advance and technology permeates every organizational function, the traditional boundary separating "tech workers" from "business workers" has become counterproductive (Davenport & Ronanki, 2018). Business leaders increasingly require technical literacy to make informed strategic decisions about cloud infrastructure investments, enterprise architecture trade-offs, and cybersecurity risk management. Conversely, technical professionals need business acumen to translate technological capabilities into market value.

This convergence creates both opportunity and urgency. Organizations that successfully build digital capabilities across their workforce demonstrate superior financial performance, enhanced innovation capacity, and improved talent retention (Kiron et al., 2017). Yet most organizations struggle to translate this awareness into effective action. Recent industry analysis reveals a concerning implementation gap: while 80 percent of technology leaders identify upskilling as their most effective strategy for closing skills gaps, only 28 percent plan substantive investments in the next two to three years (Northern Virginia Technology Council, 2024).

The stakes extend beyond competitive positioning. The World Economic Forum estimates that nearly six in ten workers will require retraining before 2030 as technological advancement, sustainability transitions, and demographic shifts reshape 22 percent of jobs globally (World Economic Forum, 2025). Organizations that fail to invest in workforce capability development risk not only falling behind competitors but also alienating employees who increasingly view learning opportunities as essential to career advancement and job satisfaction.

This article examines the digital upskilling landscape, analyzes organizational and individual consequences of capability gaps, synthesizes evidence-based intervention approaches, and proposes frameworks for building long-term organizational learning capacity.

The Digital Upskilling Landscape

Defining Digital Fluency in the Contemporary Workplace

Digital fluency represents more than technical proficiency with specific tools or platforms. Kane et al. (2019) distinguish between digital literacy—the ability to use digital tools—and digital fluency, which encompasses understanding how technologies interconnect, recognizing their strategic implications, and applying them creatively to solve business problems. This distinction proves critical when designing upskilling initiatives.

Contemporary digital fluency operates across three interconnected dimensions. Technical foundations include baseline competencies in artificial intelligence concepts, agile methodologies, data interpretation, and understanding organizational technology architecture. Technical expertise encompasses deeper specialization in areas such as machine learning, cloud infrastructure, product management, cybersecurity, and enterprise architecture. Business fundamentals comprise problem-solving capabilities, communication skills, stakeholder engagement, and organizational change management (Müller et al., 2018).

Importantly, required fluency levels vary by role. Executives need sufficient technical understanding to make informed strategic decisions and allocate resources effectively, while maintaining focus on business outcomes rather than implementation details. Middle managers require enough technical depth to evaluate proposals, prioritize initiatives, and coach team members. Individual contributors need specialized expertise within their domains plus broad awareness of how their work integrates with organizational systems.

State of Practice: Prevalence, Drivers, and Barriers

Multiple converging forces drive the digital upskilling imperative. Technological acceleration—particularly in generative AI—creates capabilities that fundamentally alter work processes across functions from customer service to software development to financial analysis (Brynjolfsson & McAfee, 2017). Organizations implementing these technologies discover that technology deployment alone produces limited value; realizing benefits requires workers who understand capabilities, recognize applications, and adapt workflows accordingly.

Labor market dynamics simultaneously tighten and shift. Analysis of 4.3 million technology job postings reveals significant mismatches between posted requirements and candidate skill profiles, with fewer than half of potential candidates possessing sought-after technical competencies (McKinsey Global Institute, 2024). This gap persists partly because educational institutions struggle to keep pace with industry evolution, creating the "skills mismatch" where 37 percent of technology leaders report disconnects between academic preparation and organizational needs (Northern Virginia Technology Council, 2024).

Employee expectations compound these challenges. Nearly half of workers report wanting more formal training in generative AI despite nearly universal basic familiarity with these tools (Mayer et al., 2025). This appetite for learning creates both opportunity and risk: organizations that provide growth opportunities attract and retain ambitious talent, while those that neglect development lose competitive positioning in talent markets (Cappelli, 2019).

Yet implementation barriers persist. Organizations cite outdated employee skill sets and insufficient training programs (46 percent), lack of practical experience (43 percent), and the previously mentioned educational misalignment (37 percent) as primary obstacles (Northern Virginia Technology Council, 2024). Perhaps more fundamentally, only 28 percent of organizations translate their acknowledgment of upskilling's importance into concrete investment plans—a revealing implementation gap.

Organizational and Individual Consequences of Digital Capability Gaps

Organizational Performance Impacts

The performance differential between digitally capable and lagging organizations continues widening. Companies demonstrating leadership in digital and AI capabilities deliver total shareholder returns two to six times higher than competitors with limited capabilities (McKinsey & Company, 2024). This performance gap stems from multiple mechanisms.

Digitally fluent organizations innovate more effectively. When employees across functions understand technological possibilities and constraints, they identify more valuable use cases, design more practical solutions, and implement changes more successfully (Nambisan et al., 2017). A consumer products manufacturer that developed comprehensive digital training for 3,000 supply chain and manufacturing employees achieved 20 to 40 percent throughput and productivity improvements within 18 months—gains attributable to workers' enhanced ability to leverage digital tools and optimize processes.

Capability gaps also impose opportunity costs through delayed or failed technology initiatives. Organizations implementing enterprise-wide systems frequently discover that user adoption determines success more than technical architecture quality. When employees lack sufficient digital fluency to understand new systems' value or use them effectively, organizations waste implementation investments and miss performance improvement opportunities (Sia et al., 2016).

Strategic agility suffers when leadership teams lack technical literacy. Executives unable to evaluate cloud migration implications, assess build-versus-buy trade-offs, or understand data governance requirements make suboptimal resource allocation decisions. They may over-rely on vendor recommendations, under-invest in critical capabilities, or pursue technically infeasible initiatives (Ross et al., 2019).

Individual and Stakeholder Impacts

For employees, digital capability gaps create career vulnerability and reduced engagement. Workers recognize that automation and AI will reshape their roles; those lacking skills to adapt face legitimate employment insecurity (Autor, 2015). This anxiety manifests in reduced productivity, decreased organizational commitment, and increased turnover intentions particularly among high-potential employees who have alternatives.

Conversely, organizations providing substantive development opportunities see measurable engagement and retention benefits. Companies excelling in people development demonstrate profit resilience and experience attrition rates approximately five percentage points lower than financially-focused competitors (Gartenberg et al., 2019). Organizations that simultaneously emphasize human capital development and financial performance achieve four times greater likelihood of outperforming competitors financially—evidence that development investments generate returns rather than merely imposing costs.

Customer and stakeholder experiences also suffer from workforce capability gaps. When employees lack digital fluency, they provide slower service, make more errors, and deliver less personalized experiences. A financial services firm discovered that frontline representatives' inability to effectively use customer data analytics tools resulted in missed cross-selling opportunities worth millions annually. Conversely, retail organizations training associates in digital customer engagement tools report improved customer satisfaction scores and increased loyalty program enrollment.

The broader talent marketplace feels these effects. Organizations known for strong development programs attract higher-quality candidates and negotiate more favorable compensation terms. Technology firms invest heavily in upskilling partly because it enhances employer brand and recruiting effectiveness. As one interviewed leader noted, candidates increasingly evaluate potential employers based on learning opportunities as much as compensation—particularly early-career talent prioritizing skill acquisition and career trajectory.

Evidence-Based Organizational Responses

Strategic Skill Prioritization and Leadership Alignment

Effective digital upskilling requires disciplined focus rather than diffuse effort. Organizations cannot simultaneously develop all employees in all competencies; attempting to do so produces superficial learning with limited application. Instead, research and practitioner experience suggest prioritizing skills that address critical business needs, close significant performance gaps, and build sustainable competitive advantages (Bersin, 2019).

Leading organizations employ several prioritization approaches:

Strategic alignment workshops bring together senior leaders to identify technology-dependent business objectives (for example, implementing AI-powered customer service, migrating to cloud infrastructure, launching data-driven product development). Leaders then work backward to identify specific skills required for success and current capability gaps.
Skills gap assessments combine employee self-evaluations, manager assessments, and objective skill testing to identify organization-wide patterns. A professional services firm discovered that while technical staff possessed strong coding capabilities, they lacked architecture and product management skills needed for client solution design—insights that refocused training investments.
Competitive intelligence analysis examines competitor capabilities and market-leading practices to identify differentiating skills. Organizations pursuing industry leadership must build capabilities matching or exceeding competitors, while those in mature markets may focus on operational efficiency skills.
Talent market analysis reviews hiring challenges and retention patterns to identify skills most critical for attracting and retaining high-value employees. Technology firms facing retention challenges often discover that employees leave for learning opportunities rather than compensation—insights that justify upskilling investments.

A global retailer exemplifies this approach. Technology leadership conducted intensive strategy sessions to identify critical capability needs for their technology organization. They recognized that managing large, matrixed organizations required both technical credibility and sophisticated stakeholder management skills. This insight drove development of a comprehensive academy emphasizing people management, strategic thinking, communications, and institutional knowledge alongside technical competencies. After pilots with 60 employees (90 percent of whom recommended the program to colleagues), the company scaled to train 1,800 employees in year one while attracting new talent drawn to these development opportunities.

Rapid, Iterative Learning Experience Development

Organizations leading in digital upskilling abandon traditional, lengthy curriculum development cycles in favor of rapid, iterative approaches. They leverage partnerships with universities, specialized learning providers, and technology vendors to accelerate content development while maintaining quality. Critically, they incorporate real-world application and feedback mechanisms rather than relying solely on knowledge transfer (Garvin et al., 2008).

Effective development approaches include:

Modular design that combines foundational content applicable across roles with specialized modules tailored to specific functions or seniority levels. A consumer packaged goods company created a digital academy with 100+ hours of content differentiated for frontline workers, change agents, and senior leaders—ensuring relevance while achieving scale.
Blended delivery combining self-paced online learning, virtual instructor-led sessions, and in-person workshops. This approach accommodates distributed workforces, respects different learning preferences, and optimizes cost-effectiveness. It also enables rapid updates as technology evolves without requiring complete program redevelopment.
Co-creation with subject matter experts pairs external learning design professionals with internal technical experts who understand organizational context, technology stack specifics, and business applications. This partnership produces higher-quality, more relevant content than either group could develop independently.
Pilot-and-scale methodology tests new programs with small, motivated cohorts who provide feedback before broader rollout. Early participants often become program advocates who encourage colleagues to participate and help refine content.
AI-augmented content development uses generative AI tools to accelerate initial content creation, generate practice scenarios, and customize materials for different audiences. While requiring careful quality review, these tools dramatically reduce development time from months to weeks.

A professional services firm launching an AI consulting practice needed to train hundreds of employees quarterly in rapidly evolving technologies. Rather than developing traditional courses, they created a three-month "skills accelerator" integrating self-assessed exercises, intensive bootcamp workshops, and apprenticeships with technology experts. Crucially, they tied learning directly to real client projects—employees applied new skills immediately while generating revenue. This approach enabled the firm to keep pace with client demand and technology evolution while providing employees practical experience that enhanced retention.

Learner-Centered Design and Ownership

Research consistently demonstrates that adult learners engage more deeply and retain more effectively when they control learning pace, content selection, and application approaches (Knowles et al., 2014). Organizations implementing this principle shift from "push" models where training is assigned to "pull" models where employees drive their development with organizational support and structure.

Effective learner-centered approaches include:

Personalized learning pathways that assess individuals' current capabilities, career aspirations, and learning preferences, then recommend customized development sequences. These systems often incorporate skill assessments, learning-style inventories, and career goal discussions to create truly individualized plans.
Internal marketplaces where employees browse available learning opportunities (courses, workshops, mentoring, project assignments) and select those aligned with their goals. This approach respects employee agency while providing organizational curation to ensure quality.
Self-service analytics giving employees visibility into their skill development progress, how their capabilities compare to role requirements and peer benchmarks, and which learning activities most effectively build targeted competencies.
Flexible modalities offering multiple ways to develop each skill—formal courses, stretch assignments, mentoring relationships, conference attendance, online communities—allowing employees to choose approaches matching their preferences and circumstances.
Time allocation policies that explicitly grant employees dedicated learning time (for example, 10 percent of work hours) and hold managers accountable for protecting this time rather than allowing operational pressures to crowd out development.

A technology company implemented an employee-led upskilling program for AI, blockchain, and robotics capabilities needed to serve client demand. Rather than mandatory training, they created an accelerator program employees could opt into, combining bootcamp-style intensive learning with apprenticeships and real project assignments. Employees appreciated the practical focus and immediate application, while the company benefited from rapid capability building that directly supported revenue generation. The voluntary nature attracted highly motivated learners who became program advocates.

Technology-Embedded Learning and Real-Time Support

Emerging practice integrates learning directly into workflow rather than separating it as distinct training activities. This approach—sometimes called "learning in the flow of work"—provides guidance, instruction, and feedback at the moment of need rather than requiring employees to attend separate training then attempt to apply lessons later (Bersin, 2018).

Implementation approaches include:

AI-powered coaching assistants that observe work activities and provide real-time suggestions for improvement. Contact centers deploy these tools to help representatives handle customer inquiries more effectively, offering script suggestions, information lookups, and communication technique coaching during conversations.
Embedded job aids and tutorials within software applications that explain features, demonstrate workflows, and provide practice scenarios without requiring users to leave the application. Modern enterprise software increasingly incorporates these contextual learning tools.
Just-in-time microlearning delivers brief (3-5 minute) lessons addressing specific skills or questions exactly when needed. An employee preparing for a difficult conversation might access a microlesson on conflict resolution; someone beginning a data analysis project might review statistical concept refreshers.
Intelligent task assignment systems that deliberately assign employees work requiring skills they're developing, providing progressive complexity as capabilities improve. This approach—essentially deliberate practice orchestrated by technology—accelerates learning while generating business value.
Automated feedback and reflection prompts that encourage employees to consciously process their experiences. After completing a project using new skills, employees receive prompts to reflect on what worked, what challenged them, and what they would do differently—converting experience into learning.

Organizations are beginning to integrate generative AI into these systems. A manager preparing for a team meeting might describe anticipated challenges to an AI assistant, receive suggestion for handling them, and even conduct simulated conversations to practice before the actual meeting. While requiring careful oversight to prevent errors, these AI-powered tools offer unprecedented personalization and immediate availability.

Manager-as-Teacher Development and Integration

Research has long established that employees acquire approximately 70 percent of job-related knowledge through direct experience, 20 percent from interactions with others (particularly managers), and 10 percent from formal learning activities (Lombardo & Eichinger, 1996). While these precise percentages may shift as technology evolves, the principle remains: most learning occurs outside formal training, with managers playing crucial facilitation roles.

Organizations advancing digital upskilling increasingly develop managers' teaching and coaching capabilities:

Coaching skills development trains managers to observe employee work, identify development opportunities, ask powerful questions that stimulate reflection, and provide constructive feedback that accelerates learning. These capabilities prove valuable beyond upskilling contexts, improving overall management quality.
Teaching rotations where experienced technical experts temporarily reduce individual contributor responsibilities to teach skills to colleagues. This approach leverages internal expertise, provides practical business context, and often proves more credible to employees than external trainers.
Structured reflection rituals establish regular manager-employee conversations focused on learning rather than task completion. Simple questions—"What did you learn this week? How will you apply it next week?"—when asked consistently, create powerful learning cultures.
Assignment design helps managers consciously structure work to develop employee capabilities, selecting projects that stretch skills, providing appropriate support, and debriefing afterwards to reinforce learning. This transforms routine work into developmental experiences.
Peer learning facilitation where managers organize and support employee-led knowledge sharing through communities of practice, lunch-and-learn sessions, or internal conferences. This democratizes expertise while building organizational knowledge networks.

A financial services company trained mid-level managers to serve as learning facilitators and coaches rather than merely assigning training. Managers learned to have development conversations, design assignments building specific skills, and provide feedback accelerating learning. This shift enhanced employee development while strengthening manager-employee relationships and improving retention—managers became valued mentors rather than task assigners.

Building Long-Term Learning Capability and Organizational Agility

Knowledge Democratization and Organizational Learning Systems

Leading organizations move beyond individual skill development to build collective organizational intelligence—creating systems that capture, codify, and share knowledge across the enterprise (Argote & Miron-Spektor, 2011). This approach recognizes that organizational capability exceeds the sum of individual skills; competitive advantage emerges from how effectively knowledge flows and accumulates.

Effective knowledge management approaches include:

Technical knowledge repositories document tools, techniques, solutions, and best practices in searchable databases. Unlike traditional documentation, these systems incorporate user ratings, comments, and updates—creating dynamic resources that improve through use. Integration of AI-powered search and summarization tools makes these repositories increasingly accessible and useful.
Internal expert directories help employees quickly identify colleagues with specific knowledge or experience. When facing unfamiliar challenges, workers can locate and consult relevant experts rather than reinventing solutions. These directories often include expertise levels, availability status, and contact preferences.
Communities of practice connect employees working in similar domains across organizational boundaries to share knowledge, solve common problems, and develop collective capabilities (Wenger & Snyder, 2000). Technology enables these communities to function effectively across geographic and organizational distances.
After-action review processes systematically capture lessons from projects, initiatives, and events before teams disband and knowledge disperses. Structured reflection on what worked, what didn't, and why converts experience into transferable insights.
Open innovation platforms invite employees across the organization to propose solutions to business challenges, vote on ideas, and collaborate on implementation. This approach surfaces insights from unexpected sources while building problem-solving capabilities.

A technology company created a comprehensive knowledge repository documenting technical solutions, common challenges, and frequently asked questions. Importantly, employees could rate content helpfulness and add their own insights—creating a continuously improving resource. AI integration enabled natural language queries and automated summarization. This system accelerated new employee onboarding, reduced duplication of effort, and captured institutional knowledge that might otherwise be lost to turnover.

Continuous Learning Culture and Psychological Safety

Organizational culture profoundly influences learning effectiveness. Cultures emphasizing perfection, punishing mistakes, and valuing knowing over learning create environments where employees hide gaps, avoid challenges, and resist change. Conversely, cultures that normalize continuous learning, embrace experimentation, and celebrate growth create conditions where capabilities flourish (Edmondson, 2018).

Building learning-conducive cultures requires:

Leader modeling where senior executives publicly discuss their own learning journeys, skills they're developing, and mistakes they've made. This vulnerability signals that continuous development applies at all levels and that admitting knowledge gaps is acceptable rather than career-limiting.
Experimentation encouragement with explicit expectation that not all initiatives will succeed but all will generate learning. Organizations might celebrate particularly valuable failures that taught important lessons, reinforcing that intelligent risk-taking is valued.
Psychological safety cultivation ensures employees can ask questions, admit uncertainty, and request help without fear of negative consequences (Edmondson, 1999). This foundation proves essential for effective learning—people cannot develop skills they're afraid to reveal they lack.
Growth mindset reinforcement through language, recognition systems, and promotion criteria emphasizing development and improvement rather than static talent (Dweck, 2016). Organizations might recognize employees who most significantly developed capabilities rather than only those with highest current performance.
Learning time protection by explicitly allocating work hours for development and holding managers accountable for preserving this time. Without protected time, operational pressures inevitably crowd out learning despite stated organizational priorities.

A manufacturing company transformed its culture by having senior leaders regularly share "learning moments"—situations where they lacked knowledge, made mistakes, or updated their thinking. This executive vulnerability created permission for employees at all levels to acknowledge knowledge gaps and seek help. Combined with protected learning time and recognition for skill development, this cultural shift enhanced both employee engagement and organizational capability.

Technology-Enabled Personalization and Adaptive Learning

Advances in learning analytics, AI, and adaptive systems enable increasingly personalized development experiences that continuously adjust to individual progress, preferences, and performance (Pane et al., 2017). These technologies promise to make learning more efficient, engaging, and effective while reducing costs.

Emerging capabilities include:

Adaptive assessment systems that adjust question difficulty based on responses to more efficiently measure current capabilities across multiple skill dimensions. These systems provide more accurate assessments in less time than traditional fixed-question approaches.
Personalized content recommendations analyze learning history, skill gaps, career goals, and peer success patterns to suggest specific learning activities most likely to help individuals achieve their objectives. These systems improve continuously as they accumulate data on what works for whom.
AI tutoring and coaching provides individualized instruction, explanations, and practice opportunities available on-demand. While not replacing human teachers, these tools offer supplemental support that adapts to individual needs and scales cost-effectively.
Gamification elements incorporate game design principles (progress tracking, achievement badges, challenges, leaderboards) to increase engagement and motivation. Research suggests carefully designed gamification can enhance learning outcomes, though poorly implemented systems can distract from substantive learning (Dichev & Dicheva, 2017).
Immersive simulation environments using virtual or augmented reality enable practice in realistic scenarios without real-world consequences. These prove particularly valuable for complex technical skills or high-stakes situations where on-the-job practice carries risks.

Organizations implementing these technologies must balance innovation with evidence. Not all technological capabilities translate to learning improvements; some may increase engagement without enhancing retention or application. Effective approaches pilot new technologies, measure outcomes rigorously, and scale what demonstrably works.

Conclusion

The digital upskilling imperative represents far more than a training challenge—it constitutes a fundamental organizational capability requirement for competing in technology-intensive markets. Organizations that treat upskilling as discretionary or tactical miss both the competitive performance opportunity and the talent engagement necessity. Research and practice consistently demonstrate that companies investing in workforce capability development outperform competitors financially, retain talent more effectively, and adapt more successfully to market changes.

Yet successful upskilling requires more than budgetary commitment. It demands strategic focus on capabilities that truly matter for competitive advantage, rapid development of relevant learning experiences, learner-centered design that respects employee agency and preferences, integration of learning into workflow rather than separation from work, and cultivation of cultures where continuous development is expected and supported. It requires developing managers as teachers and coaches, building knowledge management systems that capture and share collective intelligence, and leveraging technology to personalize and enhance learning.

Organizations beginning this journey should start with clarity about which capabilities most critically support strategy, align leadership around upskilling importance, pilot approaches with motivated learners, and scale what demonstrably works. They should measure outcomes rigorously—not just participation and satisfaction but actual skill development, application to work, and business performance improvement. They should recognize that upskilling requires sustained commitment over years rather than quick fixes, but that returns compound as capabilities accumulate and learning cultures strengthen.

The gap between digitally capable and lagging organizations continues widening. Companies that successfully build digital fluency across their workforce position themselves to capitalize on technological advances, attract and develop exceptional talent, and sustain competitive advantages. Those that delay face increasingly difficult catch-up challenges as capability gaps expand. The choice is clear; the imperative is urgent; the opportunity is significant.

References

Argote, L., & Miron-Spektor, E. (2011). Organizational learning: From experience to knowledge. Organization Science, 22(5), 1123–1137.
Autor, D. H. (2015). Why are there still so many jobs? The history and future of workplace automation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29(3), 3–30.
Bersin, J. (2018). A new paradigm for corporate training: Learning in the flow of work. Josh Bersin Academy.
Bersin, J. (2019). HR technology 2019: Unleashing transformation through technology. Deloitte Consulting.
Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2017). The business of artificial intelligence. Harvard Business Review.
Cappelli, P. (2019). Your approach to hiring is all wrong. Harvard Business Review, 97(3), 48–58.
Davenport, T. H., & Ronanki, R. (2018). Artificial intelligence for the real world. Harvard Business Review, 96(1), 108–116.
Dichev, C., & Dicheva, D. (2017). Gamifying education: What is known, what is believed and what remains uncertain. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(9), 1–36.
Dweck, C. S. (2016). Mindset: The new psychology of success (Updated ed.). Random House.
Edmondson, A. C. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383.
Edmondson, A. C. (2018). The fearless organization: Creating psychological safety in the workplace for learning, innovation, and growth. Wiley.
Gartenberg, C., Prat, A., & Serafeim, G. (2019). Corporate purpose and financial performance. Organization Science, 30(1), 1–18.
Garvin, D. A., Edmondson, A. C., & Gino, F. (2008). Is yours a learning organization? Harvard Business Review, 86(3), 109–116.
Kane, G. C., Palmer, D., Phillips, A. N., Kiron, D., & Buckley, N. (2019). Achieving digital maturity. MIT Sloan Management Review and Deloitte.
Kiron, D., Kane, G. C., Palmer, D., Phillips, A. N., & Buckley, N. (2017). Achieving digital maturity. MIT Sloan Management Review, 58(1), 1–29.
Knowles, M. S., Holton, E. F., & Swanson, R. A. (2014). The adult learner: The definitive classic in adult education and human resource development (8th ed.). Routledge.
Lombardo, M. M., & Eichinger, R. W. (1996). The career architect development planner. Lominger.
Mayer, H., Yee, L., Chui, M., & Roberts, R. (2025). Superagency in the workplace: Empowering people to unlock AI's full potential. McKinsey & Company.
McKinsey & Company. (2024). Rewired and running ahead: Digital and AI leaders are leaving the rest behind.
McKinsey Global Institute. (2024). McKinsey technology trends outlook 2024.
Müller, S. D., Skau, S. A., & Jensen, C. D. (2018). Digital fluency: Towards a framework for organizing digital competence. In T. Hattori et al. (Eds.), Information technology in organisations and societies (pp. 121–145). River Publishers.
Nambisan, S., Lyytinen, K., Majchrzak, A., & Song, M. (2017). Digital innovation management: Reinventing innovation management research in a digital world. MIS Quarterly, 41(1), 223–238.
Northern Virginia Technology Council. (2024). 2024 Northern Virginia regional tech & innovation study: Hidden in plain sight.
Pane, J. F., Steiner, E. D., Baird, M. D., Hamilton, L. S., & Pane, J. D. (2017). Informing progress: Insights on personalized learning implementation and effects. RAND Corporation.
Ross, J. W., Beath, C. M., & Mocker, M. (2019). Designed for digital: How to architect your business for sustained success. MIT Press.
Sia, S. K., Soh, C., & Weill, P. (2016). How DBS Bank pursued a digital business strategy. MIS Quarterly Executive, 15(2), 105–121.
Wenger, E. C., & Snyder, W. M. (2000). Communities of practice: The organizational frontier. Harvard Business Review, 78(1), 139–146.
World Economic Forum. (2025). Future of jobs report 2025.

Jonathan H. Westover, PhD is Chief Academic & Learning Officer (HCI Academy); Associate Dean and Director of HR Programs (WGU); Professor, Organizational Leadership (UVU); OD/HR/Leadership Consultant (Human Capital Innovations). Read Jonathan Westover's executive profile here.

Suggested Citation: Westover, J. H. (2026). Closing the Digital Skills Gap: Building Organizational Capability for the AI Era. Human Capital Leadership Review, 30(2)). doi.org/10.70175/hclreview.2020.30.2.1