The Trust Revolution: Why Your Employer Brand Lives in Employee Voices, Not Executive Messaging

What new data from The Harris Poll reveals about the shift from authority to authenticity and the leadership choices that will define your reputation.

In most organizations, "brand" is still treated like something manufactured: a campaign, a message house, a set of approved phrases. But in today's labor market, brand is increasingly something lived and shared.

Work culture has become public culture. Employees narrate layoffs, promotions, burnouts, wins, and workplace norms in real time across social platforms. Candidates and customers no longer wait for glossy careers pages; they can see what it's really like to work at your company through the voices of people who are already employed there.

This shift is happening against a backdrop where institutional trust has eroded. Congressional approval sits at 32%, and only 38% of Americans believe the country is on the right track. In this climate, authenticity isn't just preferred, it's essential for credibility.

The Authority Paradox: Why Proximity Beats Position

The data from Harris Poll’s latest research is stark: 49% of people find posts from non-executive employees authentic, compared to just 12% for executives and CEOs. If you lead people, this finding should fundamentally change how you think about "executive visibility."

This isn't to say CEO communication is irrelevant; it's just that authority no longer guarantees credibility. Authenticity flows from proximity to the actual work.

The shift extends beyond individual voices to platforms themselves. Seventy eight percent of adults view employee posts as more authentic than official corporate accounts, while 74% say employees are more influential than traditional marketing in shaping company perception.

Yet many organizations still treat employee voice as a nice-to-have: a small advocacy program or curated "brand ambassadors." The public sees it differently. People aren't just consuming corporate reputation; they're watching employees to understand what's real.

The Overblown Fear: Why Risk Management Misses the Mark

Inside companies, the default posture toward employee posting is often defensive. Don't say the wrong thing, don't create liability, don't invite criticism. But this fear is misaligned with reality.

Among people who've seen employee posts about work, 32% say it positively impacted their perception of the company, while only 19% say it had a negative impact.

When employees describe their own posting behavior, the distribution tilts even more constructive: 41% say their posts are mostly positive, 30% informational or neutral, 29% promotional, and just 12% primarily critical.

The bigger risk isn't that employees will "torch the brand." The bigger risk is over-indexing on control and missing the credibility you can't manufacture.

The Silent Majority: Why Fear Is Your Real Brand Problem

Here's the paradox: while employee voice is influential, most employees aren't using it. Nearly two-thirds of employed adults (64%) rarely or never post about their current employer, job, or industry.

Leadership often misreads this silence as apathy, but the reality is more complex. It's boundary management, risk calculation, and anxiety. Employees want to separate work from personal life and maintain psychological safety.

Most revealing: 36% of employed adults lack confidence that they can share honest opinions about their company online without facing retaliation.

The workplace climate driving this silence is getting worse, not better. Research from Express Employment Professionals reveals that 30% of currently employed job seekers in the U.S. report that their coworkers have become more confrontational than three years ago, while 22% noticed an increase in mean behavior just over the past year. Personal accounts from the survey paint a stark picture. Employees describe physical altercations, persistent sabotage attempts, and targeted bullying that ultimately forced them to resign as their mental health declined.

When hiring managers report the most common toxic behaviors as gossiping (39%), unprofessional communications (27%), and lack of collaboration (24%), it becomes clear why employees hesitate to speak authentically online. If they can't safely voice concerns internally, why would they risk doing so publicly?

That statistic about retaliation and fear belongs on every leadership dashboard. Not because every employee should post, but because fear has consequences beyond social media. It dampens candor, slows organizational learning, and weakens your ability to sense and respond to reality.

Employee advocacy is a workplace climate issue, not a marketing issue. When 62% of job seekers think simple reminders to "be nice" could help, the solution isn't more sophisticated communication strategies. It's more human workplaces.

The Full-Funnel Reality: When Walls Between Brands Collapse

The traditional way organizations categorize reputation is employer brand here, consumer brand there, internal culture somewhere else. However, that framework is obsolete. The data shows these walls are imaginary. When people see authentic employee experiences:

• 74% are more likely to apply to the company,

• 70% are more likely to buy from or support the company.

This makes employee voice strategically consequential. A single narrative can simultaneously affect talent attraction, retention, customer trust, and crisis resilience.

Importantly, most employees feel aligned with this opportunity. Three quarters (77%) are proud to tell others where they work, and 74% say their company's public image matches the internal reality.

The opportunity lies in making it safe and simple for genuine stories to surface, not manufacturing enthusiasm.

What Leaders Must Do Differently

Treat Employee Advocacy as Culture, Not Communications

The data confirms employees are more trusted than corporate channels. But most stay silent—not from indifference, but from managing boundaries and risk.

If you want authentic advocacy, start with employee experience. When people feel proud, aligned, and psychologically safe, storytelling follows naturally. No campaign can compensate for a poor workplace reality.

The strategic question isn't "How do we get employees to post?" It's "Have we built a workplace worth talking about?"

Make Psychological Safety a Reputational Strategy

When roughly one third of employees fear sharing honest opinions online, that's a brand vulnerability. In a world where reputation is shaped by peer signals, fear suppresses credibility.

Silence becomes data. When employees don't speak, audiences draw conclusions anyway. Leaders who treat online expression as compliance will get compliance. Leaders who treat it as trust will get advocacy.

Recognize That Influence Has Shifted from Authority to Proximity

Nearly half of adults see non-executive employees as authentic, compared to 12% for executives. This should reshape how you think about visibility and voice.

The most credible brand narrative now lives with people closest to the work. Elevating frontline expertise, craft, and lived experience isn't optional anymore. It's how modern reputation scales. Executive voice still matters, but it's no longer sufficient.

The Bottom Line

Your employer brand is no longer controlled by your communications team. It's distributed across every employee's network. The question isn't whether this shift will happen; it's whether you'll lead it or be led by it.

In an era where trust is scarce and authenticity is currency, the organizations that thrive will be those that make it safe for real stories to be told. Because in the end, your reputation isn't what you say about yourself, it's what your people say about you

---

Nikki Alfano, Senior Strategist, The Harris Poll.