The video discusses the inherent limitations of current artificial intelligence (AI) models, which are typically trained extensively in controlled environments but remain static once deployed. This static nature means they become outdated as the world changes, leading to costly and disruptive retraining cycles. The urgency to overcome these challenges is driven by three converging trends: skyrocketing training costs, the rapid pace of real-world changes, and evolving user expectations for dynamic, adaptive AI systems. Highlights 🔄 Current AI models are static and become outdated quickly, leading to costly retraining. 💸 Training large AI models requires enormous computational resources and financial investment. ⏳ Nested learning introduces multi-layered memory systems that operate at different timescales for dynamic knowledge updating. 🧠 Deep optimizers enable models to learn how to learn better over time, reducing fine-tuning costs. 🔧 Self-modifying sequence models adapt internal learning mechanisms automatically in response to changing data. ⚙️ Continuum Memory System links fast, medium, and slow caches to balance immediate context and long-term knowledge. 🚀 Incremental adoption, starting with small pilot projects, is crucial for successful nested learning implementation. Key Insights 🔄 Static AI Models Are Becoming Obsolete in a Dynamic World: Traditional AI models are trained once on a fixed dataset and then deployed without the ability to adapt. This static approach is akin to a “digital photograph” in a world that demands “streaming video” — models quickly fall behind as new data and contexts evolve. This gap between training and real-world changes creates a pressing need for continuous learning architectures. 💰 The Cost of Retraining AI Models Is Unsustainable: Training large language models and other AI systems requires vast computational power and financial investment. As models grow in size and complexity, the cost of retraining from scratch becomes prohibitive for most organizations. This economic pressure necessitates novel solutions that enable incremental updates without full retraining cycles. ⏳ Nested Learning’s Temporal Hierarchy Mirrors Human Memory: The nested learning framework mimics cognitive memory structures by dividing knowledge retention into layers with different decay rates — fast (seconds), medium (hours to weeks), and slow (permanent). This hierarchical design enables AI to maintain real-time coherence, consolidate recent trends, and preserve foundational knowledge, thus balancing adaptability with stability. 🧠 Deep Optimizers as Learning Meta-Agents: By extending optimizers with memory and parameters, deep optimizers act as meta-learners that improve their own update strategies over time. This innovation reduces the amount of data and computational resources needed for fine-tuning, as the optimizer “remembers” recurring patterns and anticipates future changes, leading to faster, more efficient model adaptation. 🔄 Self-Modifying Sequence Models Enable Rule-Level Adaptation: Unlike conventional models that only update knowledge, self-modifying models can adjust their own learning algorithms in response to new inputs. This capability allows AI systems to autonomously refine how they learn, improving their responsiveness to novel phenomena such as emerging slang or shifting market terminology, thereby reducing the need for human intervention. ⚙️ Continuum Memory System Replaces Rigid Memory Boundaries: Traditional AI often separates short-term and long-term memory rigidly, but the Continuum Memory System introduces chained memory caches with different decay rates. This structure supports a seamless flow of information from immediate context to long-term knowledge, ensuring that important insights are retained and integrated appropriately across timescales. 🚀 Incremental and Domain-Specific Adoption Is Critical: Organizations should begin by analyzing the temporal nature of their data and selecting pilot projects with clear, time-sensitive information flows. Implementing a two-tier memory system in targeted applications reduces complexity and risk, allowing teams to develop necessary infrastructure and skills gradually. Defining success metrics upfront ensures measurable progress and continuous improvement. If this helped, please like and share. #NestedLearning #ContinualLearning #AdaptiveAI #FoundationModels #HOPE OUTLINE: 00:00:00 - The Problem of Frozen Intelligence 00:01:41 - A Temporal Hierarchy for AI 00:03:04 - The Three Pillars of Nested Learning 00:04:57 - Practical Adoption and Governance Frameworks 00:06:19 - From Static Models to Living Systems

Abstract: This article examines Nested Learning (NL), a novel framework that reconceptualizes neural networks as hierarchical systems of interconnected optimization problems operating at multiple temporal scales. Drawing from neuroscientific principles of memory consolidation and Google Research's recent theoretical work, we explore how NL addresses fundamental limitations in current deep learning systems—particularly their static nature after deployment and inability to continually acquire new capabilities. The framework reveals that existing architectures like Transformers and optimizers such as Adam are special cases of nested associative memory systems, each compressing information within distinct "context flows." We analyze NL's implications for organizational AI strategy, examining three core innovations: deep optimizers with enhanced memory architectures, self-modifying sequence models, and continuum memory systems. Through practitioner-oriented analysis of experimental results and architectural patterns, we demonstrate how NL principles enable more adaptive, efficient, and cognitively plausible AI systems. This synthesis connects theoretical advances to practical deployment considerations for enterprises navigating the evolving landscape of foundation models and continuous learning requirements.

Abstract: Organizations increasingly rely on teams to navigate complexity, drive innovation, and adapt to rapid change, yet practitioners often lack evidence-based guidance on which investments genuinely foster team learning. This article synthesizes findings from a comprehensive meta-analysis by Nellen, Gijselaers, and Grohnert (2020) examining 50 studies across 4,778 professional teams in manufacturing, healthcare, product development, and professional services. The analysis reveals that four emergent states—psychological safety, shared cognition, team potency/efficacy, and cohesion—explain substantially more variance in team learning than direct organizational interventions. However, organizations can indirectly influence these states through strategic deployment of job resources, cultivation of supportive culture and climate, design of enabling infrastructure, and enactment of top-level leadership behaviors. The evidence challenges conventional training-centric approaches, pointing instead toward systemic environmental design. Practitioners gain specific, quantified guidance on relative effect sizes to prioritize investments; researchers receive a consolidated framework identifying robust relationships and highlighting gaps requiring further investigation.

In today’s fast-paced and ever-changing work environment, the critical capability for organizations is the continuous ability of their teams to learn, adapt, and innovate. Traditional approaches, which emphasize formal training programs and tools, often fail because they treat learning as a one-time event rather than an ongoing process embedded in daily work. The root issue lies not in the employees but in the organizational environment that does not nurture natural team learning. Instead of focusing on individual learning or isolated training interventions, leaders must design team environments—organizational ecosystems—that foster continuous learning as an emergent property of collaborative work. Highlights 🌱 Learning is an ongoing, emergent process, not a one-time event. 🧠 Team learning depends on environmental design, not just individual training. 🔐 Psychological safety is the foundation for effective team learning. 🎯 Shared cognition aligns team members on goals and process. 💪 Team efficacy drives motivation and resilience through challenges. 🤝 Cohesion builds trust, support, and a sense of belonging. 🚀 Designing team ecosystems unlocks continuous innovation and adaptability. Key Insights 🌟 The Limitations of Traditional Training: In-depth analysis Traditional training programs often fail because they view learning as discrete, time-bound events separate from daily work realities. Employees may feel motivated immediately after training but quickly revert to old habits due to unsupportive work environments. This reveals a fundamental misconception: learning cannot be “downloaded” into individuals but must be nurtured through ongoing interactions within the team’s context. 🌍 The Environment as the Stage for Learning: In-depth analysis Learning is a collective phenomenon shaped by the team’s environment—the organizational “soil” rather than just the “leaves” (individual skills). Efforts that focus solely on improving individual capabilities without reshaping team dynamics and systems are unlikely to yield lasting change. Leaders must architect ecosystems promoting collaboration, experimentation, and shared inquiry to enable natural learning. 🔐 Psychological Safety as the Keystone: In-depth analysis Psychological safety is the most foundational team state for learning. When team members trust that they can be vulnerable without fear of reprisal, they contribute openly, share mistakes, and challenge ideas. This openness is critical for experimenting, adapting, and surfacing new knowledge. Without psychological safety, teams stagnate and suppress innovation. 🎯 Shared Cognition Enables Coordination and Focus: In-depth analysis A common mental model is essential for teams to function cohesively. Shared understanding of goals, strategies, and roles ensures that members act in concert rather than at cross purposes. This alignment reduces friction, enhances efficiency, and helps teams quickly learn from collective experiences by interpreting results through a shared lens. 💪 Team Efficacy Fuels Persistence and Growth: In-depth analysis Belief in the team’s ability to succeed fosters resilience. Teams with high efficacy see setbacks as learning opportunities rather than failures, which motivates them to invest extra effort and seek solutions proactively. This mindset transforms challenges into catalysts for development, sustaining long-term learning momentum. 🤝 Cohesion Builds Emotional Commitment: In-depth analysis Emotional bonds and mutual support strengthen the team’s commitment to shared goals. Cohesion creates a safety net where members feel valued and supported, which reinforces psychological safety and efficacy. A cohesive team is more likely to engage in collaborative problem-solving and collective learning. 🚀 Designing for Emergent Learning: In-depth analysis The most effective way to foster team learning is not through isolated training but by intentionally designing work environments that cultivate these four states. This systemic approach transforms learning from a forced activity into a natural, continuous outcome of teamwork. Leaders who embrace this design mindset can unlock their teams’ full potential for innovation and adaptability in a rapidly shifting world. If this helped you, please like and share the video. #TeamLearning #PsychologicalSafety #CollectiveIntelligence #OrganizationalDesign #LD #HR #LeadershipResearch OUTLINE: 00:00:00 - Beyond Traditional Training 00:00:56 - Beyond Training: Design The Environment 00:01:51 - From Soil To Systemic Design 00:02:59 - The Four Pillars Of A Learning Team 00:04:01 - The Four Pillars Continued + Organizational Levers

The traditional model of career progression, defined by fixed job titles and hierarchical ladders, is rapidly becoming obsolete due to technological advancements such as AI and automation, which are reshaping the labor market at an unprecedented pace. This dynamic environment demands a shift toward skills-based talent management, a system that prioritizes employees’ actual capabilities over their job titles or past roles. This new paradigm views employees as fluid portfolios of skills—technical, human, and cognitive—that can be flexibly deployed to meet evolving business needs. Highlights 🔄 The traditional career ladder is being replaced by a flexible, skills-based approach. 💡 Skills-based talent management views employees as dynamic portfolios of capabilities, not fixed job titles. 🚀 This approach boosts organizational agility, internal mobility, and cross-functional collaboration. 📚 Continuous learning and development are central to empowering employees and sustaining growth. 🗣️ Transparent communication and trust-building are crucial to managing change and reducing employee anxiety. 🤝 The cultural shift requires rebuilding the psychological contract around employability and shared responsibility for talent. 🔧 Technology and data-driven systems underpin the effective implementation of skills-based talent management. Key Insights 🔄 From Titles to Capabilities: The Paradigm Shift The move away from fixed job titles toward a skills-centric model reflects the need for speed and flexibility in today’s volatile market. Job titles, once reliable markers of expertise and role, now lag behind rapid changes in required competencies. Recognizing employees by their skills rather than titles allows companies to respond instantly to emerging challenges and opportunities, fostering a more adaptive workforce. This shift also democratizes career growth, enabling employees to craft unique and personalized career trajectories aligned with their evolving skill sets. 🚀 Organizational Agility Through Internal Talent Marketplaces Skills-based talent management transforms internal mobility from a bureaucratic hurdle into a strategic advantage. By maintaining a dynamic skills inventory and using technology to match skills with business needs, organizations unlock hidden potential. Employees can contribute beyond their traditional roles, such as a software engineer supporting sales or a marketer aiding finance projects. This fluid redeployment accelerates problem-solving, enhances cross-pollination of ideas, and builds resilience against market disruptions. 📚 Continuous Learning as a Core Organizational Competency Embedding learning into everyday work shifts the culture from reactive training to proactive development. Offering on-demand courses, mentorship, and stretch assignments encourages employees to own their growth. When managers act as career coaches, identifying skill gaps and connecting individuals with resources, learning becomes a shared responsibility. This continuous upskilling is vital to keep pace with technological advances and maintain employability, making the workforce future-ready. 🗣️ Communication and Trust: Pillars of Change Management Transitioning to a skills-based system can induce uncertainty about career progression and pay equity. Without clear, ongoing communication explaining the purpose, benefits, and mechanics of the change, employee morale and trust can erode. Leaders must engage in radical transparency, creating forums for dialogue and feedback, and sustain communication beyond initial announcements. Trust is the currency that enables employees to embrace new ways of working, supporting the cultural shift required for success. 🤝 Rebuilding the Psychological Contract Around Employability The traditional implicit deal—job security in exchange for loyalty—is no longer viable. The new contract emphasizes employability, where the employer commits to providing continuous learning and transparent access to opportunities, while the employee commits to adaptability and self-driven development. This mutual understanding fosters a resilient workforce willing to embrace change, reducing resistance and anxiety associated with career uncertainty. Clear articulation and consistent upholding of this contract are essential to rebuild and maintain trust. If this helped, please like and share the video! #SkillsBased #TalentManagement #HR #LearningAndDevelopment #InternalMobility OUTLINE: 00:00:00 - Why Work Is Changing 00:01:38 - Benefits And Risks Of A Skills-First Approach 00:03:52 - Five Practical Steps For Leaders 00:05:58 - Trust, Shared Responsibility, And Continuous Learning 00:08:07 - Your First Steps In 2025

Crises are inevitable disruptions that challenge organizations, exposing vulnerabilities and demanding rapid adaptation. Whether a global pandemic, supply chain breakdown, cyberattack, or natural disaster, such events bring uncertainty, stress, and fear, compelling teams to focus primarily on survival. However, embedded within these challenges lies a powerful opportunity for growth through learning. The process begins with anticipation—cultivating organizational readiness by scanning for early warning signs, encouraging cross-departmental communication, and conducting low-stakes drills to identify gaps before a crisis hits. When a crisis unfolds, effective leadership, clear communication, and well-defined roles become critical to navigating the turmoil. Real-world examples from healthcare and retail illustrate how organizations can adapt by analyzing failures, diversifying resources, and redeploying personnel. Central to successful crisis management is psychological safety—creating environments where team members feel secure to voice concerns and share insights without fear. Capturing and institutionalizing lessons learned through simple, accessible documentation ensures knowledge retention and continuous improvement. Ultimately, thriving amid uncertainty requires a cultural commitment to curiosity and adaptive learning, cultivated through consistent, incremental actions rather than waiting for perfect systems. The recommended starting point is straightforward: conduct brief, regular debriefs after unexpected events to embed learning as a lasting organizational habit. Highlights 🌪️ Crises disrupt organizations but also present critical learning opportunities. 👀 Anticipation involves scanning for weak signals and preparing through low-cost drills. 🗣️ Clear communication and defined roles are essential during active crises. 🏥 Healthcare and retail sectors provide practical examples of crisis adaptation. 🔐 Psychological safety empowers frontline workers to share vital information openly. 💾 Capturing lessons learned prevents knowledge loss and drives continuous improvement. 🚀 Progress over perfection: start small with regular reviews to build resilience. Key Insights 🌱 Anticipation as an Organizational Muscle: Rather than seeking to predict the future, anticipation focuses on cultivating a state of mindful readiness. This involves actively scanning for minor anomalies or “weak signals” that may indicate emerging risks. By fostering cross-functional communication forums and conducting simple scenario drills, organizations can uncover hidden vulnerabilities and improve decision-making processes ahead of crises. This proactive stance reduces the chaos when disruptions occur and builds confidence in the team’s ability to respond. 🧭 The Critical Role of Leadership During Crisis: In the coping phase, leaders must provide calm, clear direction and cut through information overload. Ambiguity and overlapping responsibilities can paralyze efforts, so explicitly defining roles avoids confusion and duplication. Leaders who communicate decisively and maintain focus on vital tasks help maintain organizational coherence and morale under pressure. This clarity is a key factor differentiating organizations that endure crises from those that falter. 🏥 Healthcare Sector Lessons Demonstrate Effective Crisis Learning: The example of an urban clinic during the COVID-19 pandemic highlights how rapid, inclusive debriefs can uncover systemic issues like procurement delays and communication breakdowns. By involving diverse stakeholders—nurses, doctors, supply chain staff—the clinic identified bottlenecks and improved resource management with real-time tracking tools. This not only optimized patient care but enhanced staff safety during subsequent waves, illustrating how learning from crisis leads to tangible operational improvements. 🛒 Retail Industry Adaptation Shows the Power of Flexibility: The response of a major retail chain to lockdowns—redeploying store employees to manage online orders and converting closed stores into fulfillment centers—demonstrates agility in crisis. Investing in cross-training and e-commerce infrastructure allowed the organization to pivot business models rapidly. This agility underscores the importance of adaptability as a competitive advantage and a survival mechanism in uncertain environments. #OrganizationalLearning #CrisisManagement #AdaptiveCapacity #Resilience #Leadership OUTLINE: 00:00:00 - The Unavoidable Classroom of Crisis 00:00:45 - Anticipation, Coping, and Adaptation 00:01:57 - Real-World Lessons from the Front Lines 00:03:05 - Safety, Structure, and Lasting Knowledge 00:04:14 - Building Resilience Today

Abstract: Organizations are increasingly moving away from traditional job-based hiring and development models toward skills-based talent management approaches. This shift reflects changing workforce expectations, technological disruption, and the need for organizational agility in volatile business environments. This article examines the organizational and individual consequences of adopting skills-based frameworks, drawing on research in organizational psychology, human resource management, and change management. Evidence suggests that skills-based approaches can improve talent mobility, development effectiveness, and organizational adaptability when implemented thoughtfully. The article presents evidence-based interventions including transparent skills frameworks, internal mobility infrastructure, capability-building investments, and technology-enabled talent systems. Three pillars for long-term success are explored: psychological contract recalibration, distributed talent stewardship, and continuous learning ecosystems. Practitioners will find actionable guidance for navigating this transition while maintaining trust and performance.

In this HCI Webinar, Dr. Jonathan H. Westover talks with Chris Wong about how nonprofit leaders can engage and develop employees , despite a lack of resources. Chris Wong is a licensed therapist, executive coach, and co-host of The Art and Science of Difficult Conversations—a podcast for people who want to lead with more clarity, confidence, and courage... by leaning into the hard conversations.  With over 15 years of experience in the nonprofit and healthcare sectors, Chris specializes in helping purpose-driven leaders navigate messy transitions, fix dysfunctional teams, and lead culture change that actually sticks. He’s worked as a therapist, built leadership programs from scratch, and coached hundreds of leaders who were brought in to “turn things around” under pressure. Chris lives outside Boston with his wife and two kids, serves on multiple nonprofit boards, and runs Leadership Potential, where he coaches new nonprofit executives to lead through chaos and build high-performing, values-aligned teams.