Featuring scholarly and practitioner insights from HR and people leaders, industry experts, and researchers.

Despite heavy financial investments in artificial intelligence, most organizations struggle to realize meaningful enterprise-level returns from their technology initiatives. This disconnect persists primarily because leaders focus on tool-centric pilots or immediate headcount reductions rather than fundamentally restructuring their operational workflows. To capture the redesign dividend, businesses must deliberately reorganize tasks, roles, and decision rights so human employees and AI agents can effectively complement one another. Achieving long-term success requires implementing strict stopping rules for failing projects, reinvesting freed capacity into growth, and governing economics through concrete outcome measures. Ultimately, organizations must integrate technology planning with comprehensive workforce and job redesign to transform superficial productivity into true financial value.

Despite heavy financial investments in artificial intelligence, most organizations struggle to realize meaningful enterprise-level returns from their technology initiatives. This disconnect persists primarily because leaders focus on tool-centric pilots or immediate headcount reductions rather than fundamentally restructuring their operational workflows. To capture the redesign dividend, businesses must deliberately reorganize tasks, roles, and decision rights so human employees and AI agents can effectively complement one another. Achieving long-term success requires implementing strict stopping rules for failing projects, reinvesting freed capacity into growth, and governing economics through concrete outcome measures. Ultimately, organizations must integrate technology planning with comprehensive workforce and job redesign to transform superficial productivity into true financial value.

Despite heavy financial investments in artificial intelligence, most organizations struggle to realize meaningful enterprise-level returns from their technology initiatives. This disconnect persists primarily because leaders focus on tool-centric pilots or immediate headcount reductions rather than fundamentally restructuring their operational workflows. To capture the redesign dividend, businesses must deliberately reorganize tasks, roles, and decision rights so human employees and AI agents can effectively complement one another. Achieving long-term success requires implementing strict stopping rules for failing projects, reinvesting freed capacity into growth, and governing economics through concrete outcome measures. Ultimately, organizations must integrate technology planning with comprehensive workforce and job redesign to transform superficial productivity into true financial value.

Despite heavy financial investments in artificial intelligence, most organizations struggle to realize meaningful enterprise-level returns from their technology initiatives. This disconnect persists primarily because leaders focus on tool-centric pilots or immediate headcount reductions rather than fundamentally restructuring their operational workflows. To capture the redesign dividend, businesses must deliberately reorganize tasks, roles, and decision rights so human employees and AI agents can effectively complement one another. Achieving long-term success requires implementing strict stopping rules for failing projects, reinvesting freed capacity into growth, and governing economics through concrete outcome measures. Ultimately, organizations must integrate technology planning with comprehensive workforce and job redesign to transform superficial productivity into true financial value.

Abstract: Despite several years of heavy investment in generative and agentic artificial intelligence, most organizations report little enterprise-level value. Recent surveys of chief information officers and chief executives show that only a small minority of enterprises have realized significant or transformational value, that most AI use cases fail, and that many leaders struggle to demonstrate financial returns. This article argues that the gap is primarily a work design problem rather than a technology problem. Drawing on field experiments, sociotechnical systems theory, job design research, and economic studies of automation, it explains why tool-centric pilots and headcount-first strategies tend to disappoint. It then outlines five evidence-based responses: redesigning workflows end to end, writing explicit role-redesign plans for a human-agent workforce, installing stopping rules for low-value initiatives, reinvesting freed capacity, and governing AI economics through outcome measures. Organizational examples from financial services, retail, biotechnology, education technology, and software illustrate both promising practice and costly missteps. The article closes with three long-term capabilities that allow organizations to capture what it calls the redesign dividend.

Recent research reveals that leader depletion has become a critical, yet hidden, performance risk as executives and managers struggle to maintain their energy amid continuous organizational restructuring and technological disruption. Grounded in frameworks like the job demands-resources model, data show that the vast majority of leaders are trapped in an unengaged "lukewarm middle" or feel completely used up by the end of the workday. This chronic exhaustion significantly degrades leadership behaviors, dampens team morale, and impairs an organization's ability to detect operational problems early. To combat this widespread issue, companies must treat leader energy as a strategic enterprise resource rather than a personal problem. Effective organizational solutions include redesigning leadership roles to reduce administrative burdens, building collective recovery rhythms, offering accessible coaching, and fostering supportive peer communities. Ultimately, organizations must shift away from demanding a heroic, unsustainable pace and instead cultivate cultures where sustainable leadership and active energy management are prioritized from the top down.

Recent research reveals that leader depletion has become a critical, yet hidden, performance risk as executives and managers struggle to maintain their energy amid continuous organizational restructuring and technological disruption. Grounded in frameworks like the job demands-resources model, data show that the vast majority of leaders are trapped in an unengaged "lukewarm middle" or feel completely used up by the end of the workday. This chronic exhaustion significantly degrades leadership behaviors, dampens team morale, and impairs an organization's ability to detect operational problems early. To combat this widespread issue, companies must treat leader energy as a strategic enterprise resource rather than a personal problem. Effective organizational solutions include redesigning leadership roles to reduce administrative burdens, building collective recovery rhythms, offering accessible coaching, and fostering supportive peer communities. Ultimately, organizations must shift away from demanding a heroic, unsustainable pace and instead cultivate cultures where sustainable leadership and active energy management are prioritized from the top down.

Recent research reveals that leader depletion has become a critical, yet hidden, performance risk as executives and managers struggle to maintain their energy amid continuous organizational restructuring and technological disruption. Grounded in frameworks like the job demands-resources model, data show that the vast majority of leaders are trapped in an unengaged "lukewarm middle" or feel completely used up by the end of the workday. This chronic exhaustion significantly degrades leadership behaviors, dampens team morale, and impairs an organization's ability to detect operational problems early. To combat this widespread issue, companies must treat leader energy as a strategic enterprise resource rather than a personal problem. Effective organizational solutions include redesigning leadership roles to reduce administrative burdens, building collective recovery rhythms, offering accessible coaching, and fostering supportive peer communities. Ultimately, organizations must shift away from demanding a heroic, unsustainable pace and instead cultivate cultures where sustainable leadership and active energy management are prioritized from the top down.