top of page
HCL Review
nexus institue transparent.png
Catalyst Center Transparent.png
Adaptive Lab Transparent.png
Foundations of Leadership
DEIB
Purpose-Driven Workplace
Creating a Dynamic Organizational Culture
Strategic People Management Capstone

More Than a Quarter of Rejected Job Applications Had Nothing to Do With the Candidate, VA Masters Data Shows


Analysis of 16,308 recorded rejection decisions finds that resume ratings and practical ability often tell different stories.


September 2026. When a job application goes nowhere, most candidates assume they did something wrong. A new analysis by VA Masters, which recruits Filipino virtual assistants for businesses internationally, suggests that is often not the case.


The agency examined 16,308 applications with a recorded rejection reason, received between January 2025 and September 2026. It found that 27.7% were rejected because the role itself closed or was put on hold. The client filled the position elsewhere, changed plans or paused hiring. Nothing about the candidate came into it.


Why Applications Were Rejected (January 2025 to September 2026, 16,308
Applications)

• Failed the practical skills test: 35.9%

• Role closed or put on hold: 27.7%

• Not enough relevant experience: 16.8%

• Client chose another candidate: 8.4%

• Communication or role fit: 7.8%

• Did not respond or withdrew: 3.3%

• Other: 0.2%


Taken together, roles closing and clients choosing someone else account for roughly 36% of rejections. These are outcomes driven by circumstances rather than capability.


Similar Resumes, Very Different Results

The analysis also found that a resume rating did not reliably predict how a candidate would perform on practical work.


Candidates rejected for insufficient relevant experience and candidates who failed the skills test had almost identical average resume ratings: 1.76 and 1.71 out of 5. On the practical assessment, however, the two groups were far apart. Those rejected for experience averaged 3.51 out of 5, while those who failed the test averaged 2.40.


In other words, many candidates turned down for experience could do the work. Their background on paper did not show it.


Alon Pearl, remote hiring expert and founder and CEO of VA Masters, says:


“A resume tells you where someone has been. It doesn’t tell you what they can do on Monday morning. In our data, candidates with almost identical resume ratings produced very different results once they sat down and did the work. If your background doesn’t show your ability on paper, bring a sample that does: a spreadsheet you built, an inbox process you set up, a before-and-after. Then explain how those skills carry over to the role you’re applying for.”


Age Made No Difference

The analysis found no relationship between age and rejection. The median age of rejected candidates sat between 28 and 31 in every rejection category. No age group was rejected more often, and none was rejected for different reasons.


Advice For Job Seekers

Pearl adds:


“A rejection with little explanation can leave you picking apart your resume, even when you don’t know whether that was the issue. Ask for feedback if you can, but avoid treating every unsuccessful application as a reason to start from scratch.


"For your next application, use the job description to guide your preparation. If the role involves spreadsheets, customer inquiries or scheduling, practice those tasks and have examples ready to discuss. If you’re invited to an assessment, ask about the format, the time involved and which tools you’re allowed to use.”

About the Data: The analysis draws on the VA Masters applicants database, covering applications received between January 2025 and September 2026. It includes the 16,308 applications that carry a recorded rejection reason. Recorded reasons were consolidated into six groups, with a small “other” category. Resume ratings and practical assessment scores are internal five-point ratings from VA Masters’ recruitment process, and each average is calculated among applicants who had the relevant score. The findings describe VA Masters’ own recruitment process, which is built around a practical skills test tailored to each client’s role. A process built differently would produce a different breakdown, and the share of candidates failing a skills test is high here partly because the test is used. The results should be read as a detailed view of one large recruitment pipeline rather than a measurement of the remote job market as a whole. Full findings and methodology: https://vamasters.com/why-candidates-dont-get-hired-2026/


VA Masters recruits and places skilled Filipino virtual assistants with businesses in the US, UK, Australia and beyond. The company has made more than 1,000 placements to date, selecting candidates through practical assessments tailored to each role.




Human Capital Leadership Review

eISSN 2693-9452 (online)

future of work collective transparent.png
Renaissance Project transparent.png

Subscription Form

HCI Academy Logo
Effective Teams in the Workplace
Employee Well being
Fostering Change Agility
Servant Leadership
Strategic Organizational Leadership Capstone
bottom of page