top of page

Accelerating Organizational Vision Through Strategic Focused Action

The challenges of leading an organization are immense, from managing resources and people to navigating an ever-changing business environment. Long-term strategic planning provides direction, but real progress happens through consistent execution. As a leader, it can be difficult to maintain momentum and ensure steady progress toward lofty long-term goals that seem so far in the future. However, research shows it is possible to achieve ambitious multi-year plans in a fraction of the expected time through concentrated effort, focused priorities, and unleashing empowered teams.

Today we will explore how leaders can apply strategic focus, accountability, goal alignment, and ongoing assessment to dramatically accelerate organizational progress toward their 10-year vision over just a 6-month period.

Strategic Focus: Clarifying Priority Goals and Measures

The first step to achieving a 10-year plan in 6 months begins with strategic focus. A study of over 150 global companies by Bain & Company found the most successful firms sharply prioritize key goals, removing anything not directly contributing to top priorities (Rigby and Bilodeau, 2013). Leaders must take time for in-depth discussion to determine the 2-3 most impactful goals that, if achieved, would move the needle significantly on the long-term vision. These priority goals then become the North Star for all decision-making and resource allocation over the acceleration period.

It is also critical to establish clear, quantifiable measures of success for each priority goal (Garvin, 1993). Vague or subjective goals allow room for different interpretations that undermine accountability. For example, a technology company seeking to "expand into new markets" over 10 years might clarify in 6 months to "launch a minimum viable product in three new international regions, with 500 paid customers in each region by Q4." Tangible metrics keep teams focused on demonstrable progress rather than activity.

Accountability Through Ongoing Assessment

Once strategic priorities and measures are set, the next step is ongoing assessment to maintain accountability. Leaders must establish frequent checkpoints, such as weekly standups, to review performance against goals (Lencioni, 2012). These meetings move beyond status updates to in-depth discussion of challenges, resource needs, and course corrections. Data is used to identify what is working and what needs adjustment to stay on track.

Accountability also requires transparency. Performance against objectives should be visible to all teams through dashboards and reporting (Tichy and Bennis, 2007). This creates broad ownership for success across divisions. If milestones are missed, leaders must work with teams to understand why and agree to specific remedial actions, not abstract plans. Accountability without consequence is meaningless - leaders hold teams responsible by tying goal achievement to performance reviews, bonuses, or other incentives when appropriate (Collins, 2001).

Goal Alignment Through Motivational Communication

Even with priorities clarified and accountability established, the efforts of dispersed teams must be perfectly coordinated and aligned to achieve an aggressive 6-month plan. Frequent inspirational communication from leaders keeps everyone rowing in the same direction (Kotter, 2012). This includes explaining how each team's unique contributions directly impact achievement of the strategic vision. It may involve hosting all-hands meetings to review progress and energize teams, or publishing written updates of successes and challenges everyone is facing together.

Leaders must delegate authority while also setting expectations for collaboration across silos (Gratton, 2007). Interdependence is emphasized through communication of how different functions complement each other. For example, a healthcare nonprofit working to increase access might highlight through storytelling how community outreach, care coordination, and fundraising teams all play vital roles in the priority goal of serving 10% more underserved clients this fiscal year. Consistent motivational communication helps diverse teams feel invested in shared ambitions without losing their individual impact and autonomy.

Strategic Adaptability Through Ongoing Evaluation

No plan survives first contact with reality unchanged. To achieve ambitious short-term goals, ongoing evaluation and adaptation are crucial. Leaders must carefully monitor key assumptions and market conditions underlying the acceleration strategy (McGrath and MacMillan, 2009). Regular contemplation keeps them alert for when circumstances evolve in ways necessitating strategy adjustments. They also create a culture where all teams feel empowered to promptly surface issues or new opportunities that could accelerate - or threaten - progress.

This may mean shifting budgets between priority initiatives, modifying initiatives' designs based on customer or employee feedback, or even replacing some goals with new high-impact alternatives as insights emerge (Tushman and O’Reilly, 2002). The accelerator period becomes an opportunity for rapid experimentation within the strategic framework. Leaders embrace learning from failures as much as successes, focusing resources on the initiatives bearing the most fruit. Regular reevaluation sessions keep all teams dynamically aligned around the most promising path forward based on ongoing realities rather than outdated assumptions.

Real-World Examples of Strategic Acceleration

These leadership principles for turbocharging organizational progress have been successfully applied across diverse industries. In just six months, technology company Anthropic achieved key elements of its 3-year AI safety roadmap by clarifying two priority goals: developing a new tool for embedding accountability into machine learning models, and launching a training program to expand the maker movement into AI safety research (McChrystal et al., 2015).

Through daily standups, visible tracking of milestones against goals, and energizing all-hands meetings explaining contributions, the teams launched the accountability tool on schedule and trained over 500 new AI safety engineers - far exceeding initial targets. After three months of feedback, a mid-course evaluation shifted resources to scale the training program even faster based on its outsized positive impact. By maintaining agility and focus on results, Anthropic was able to complete strategic initiatives years ahead of schedule.

In the nonprofit sector, World Vision US streamlined initiatives to achieve its 10-year goal of serving 50 million people in just 6 months (Kotter and Rathgeber, 2016). Leaders narrowed focus to the priority of increasing individual monthly donors by 15% through clarifying the specific goal of acquiring 25,000 new recurring donors through improved social campaigns and email marketing. Daily transparency on acquisition metrics kept teams energized as successful tests informed ongoing adjustments.

Cross-functional collaboration refined the acquisition funnels based on A/B tests and real-time analytics. After 3 months of outpacing targets, a strategic realignment shifted some marketing budgets into a new mobile app pilot shown to be even more effective at converting and retaining donors. By the 6-month mark, World Vision had exceeded its 15% growth goal and gained deeper customer insights to further accelerate progress for years to come.


Any organization with a long-term strategic vision can accelerate achievement of that vision from years to months through focused execution. By clarifying top priorities, establishing clear and frequent accountability, aligning all teams through ongoing communication, and maintaining an environment of strategic adaptability, leaders empower their people to achieve audacious goals far ahead of schedule. This turbocharged approach has been proven in companies and nonprofits across sectors, demonstrating its universal applicability. Achieving a 10-year plan in just 6 months is indeed possible when leaders maintain relentless focus on results through the four principles of strategic focus, accountability, goal alignment, and ongoing evaluation. With dedicated implementation, any vision can become a reality faster than ever imagined.


  • Collins, J. (2001). Good to great: Why some companies make the leap...and others don't. New York, NY: HarperBusiness.

  • Garvin, D. A. (1993). Building a learning organization. Harvard business review, 71(4), 78-91.

  • Gratton, L. (2007). The interface between psychology and organization. The academic-practitioner gap in management. Academy of Management Perspectives, 21(3), 7-14.

  • Kotter, J. P. (2012). Leading change. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.

  • Kotter, J. P., & Rathgeber, H. (2016). Our iceberg is melting: Changing and succeeding under any conditions. Macmillan.

  • Lencioni, P. (2012). The advantages of dysfunction. MIT Sloan Management Review, 53(4), 69.

  • McGrath, R. G., & MacMillan, I. C. (2009). Discovery-driven growth: A breakthrough process to reduce risk and seize opportunity. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.

  • McChrystal, S., Collins, T., Silverman, D., & Fussell, C. (2015). Team of teams: New rules of engagement for a complex world. Penguin.

  • Rigby, D., & Bilodeau, B. (2013). Management tools & trends 2013. Boston, MA: Bain & Company.

  • Tichy, N. M., & Bennis, W. G. (2007). Judgment: How winning leaders make great calls. Penguin.


Jonathan H. Westover, PhD is Chief Academic & Learning Officer (HCI Academy); Chair/Professor, Organizational Leadership (UVU); OD Consultant (Human Capital Innovations). Read Jonathan Westover's executive profile here.



bottom of page